Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 March 5

< March 4	March 6 >

March 5

File:Famous Macedonians1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3 source files deleted on commons. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 09:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FloydAbramsNewYork1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to both File:FloydAbramsNewYork.JPG and File:FloydAbramsNewYork2.jpg. The crop of this file is neither here nor there, source is the full image and "2" is an actual crop to show the subject without excessive clutter. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to File:FloydAbramsNewYork.JPG. Salavat (talk) 15:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Salmeterol pictorial.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:18, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic: The pictured synthesis is erroneous. When doubting, please refer to PubChem to validate any future illustrations of chemical structures. Mechlia (talk) 18:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

For those playing along at home: commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Salmeterol pictorial.png. DMacks (talk) 21:13, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:DariusvanDriel-Noordwijk161016.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Does not appear to be a selfie, which means the uploader is not the copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 03:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agree to delete this photo. I made the photo, am the copyright holder and uploaded it but it is now out of date and of no further value.

Pls delete.

Bryannl Bryannl (talk) 14:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.