Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 June 9

< June 8	June 10 >

June 9

File:Manchester Marathon Finishers Medal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a medal for a specific year's event, not a generic logo to identify the marathon event. As such, fails WP:NFCC#8. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "M" logo is used by them year after year with all the branding involving it in some form but I imagine you have a better understanding of the rules than me. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 14:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NFCC#8 as noted in the nomination, and it is not being used for identification at the top of the article as claimed but rather way down the article. The logo image used on the marathons web site would be suitable for the purpose of identification. Whpq (talk) 19:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, the marathon logo appears to just be an M, so would be a freely usuable logo. Will upload it at some point. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture Scrapbook.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope, unused in any projects, likely full of copyrighted materials. Seloloving (talk) 13:03, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 11:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, purely artistic with no encyclopedic value. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:06, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, It is "llitrely" AND "litraley" not of good use. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 19:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture wireless usb device connections.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of a Windows XP Microsoft program. Unlikely to be out of copyright. Seloloving (talk) 13:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 11:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as the image is not used for commentary. Per Salavat, it is also orphaned. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 19:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Only Fools A Slow Bus.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free screenshot is used in a TV episode article claiming that the image depicts a memorable and iconic part of the episode. There is no significant sourced commentary about the image or anything in the article that explains or shows that this scene is memorable and iconic as claimed. In fact, the article is almost entirely unsourced. Whpq (talk) 17:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ilostafriendmarian.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This cover art is for a second version/remix which had a limited release/promotion compared to the main version. Per WP:NFCC multiple non-free artworks should not be used where there is no sufficient or contextual additional understanding for readings. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 19:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mark Essex navy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The website from which this image is taken says it is a U.S. Navy photo. It might be worth investigating whether {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}} applies. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons per {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}}. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 19:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons Since this was taken as a tenure during the Navy, it is almost certainly public domain per {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}} CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 00:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.