Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 July 17

< July 16	July 18 >

July 17

File:Ajstill1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The copyright belongs to the photographer, not the subject in the photo. Requires WP:VRT permission. ✗plicit 11:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:49, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Uploader has the same name as the subject of the image, Teymoor (Nabili). It's completely plausible that it is indeed the uploader's own work. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Growler pilot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an own work unless the uploader is the pilot or this file was released by the U.S. government. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a photo taken by a US government employee in the course of his/her duties. It is PD by definition. Fixing PD status now. Buffs (talk) 03:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. The status of the uploader is irrelevant as is the release/nonrelease by the US Govt. Also, there is no evidence that this WASN'T the uploader. I see no reason to doubt them. Buffs (talk) 03:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Added to active article. Buffs (talk) 03:58, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LauraDickinson.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work per User talk:Elsielaura --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it seems to be an image copied from her now-defunct website by a fan, the uploader, judging by a TinEye search. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Judy Baar Topinka CoI official F4912D2E-1CC1-DE6E-2F48721070FAD266 180x180.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An alternative public-domain photograph (File:Judy Baar Topinka, State Treasurer (01) (1).jpg) has been found. While not the greatest photo, it is adequate enough that the use rationale of this image is void SecretName101 (talk) 08:34, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mars Society Australia logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image not being used anymore CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 08:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CactiStaccingCrane: Unused non-free files don't have to be added here. They are deleted automatically about seven days after they get unused by a bot which recognizes this.Jonteemil (talk)

Soft delete for as long as the Australian branch of the group is not significantly written about in the main Mars Society article. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:National wiki.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), citing this discussion. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fake SVG without usecase. Jonteemil (talk) 23:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:34, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as broken fake SVG copy of the already-in-place JPEG on Commons. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.