Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 September 24

< September 23	September 25 >

September 24

File:Santa Monica Camera Obscura.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 October 2. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:51, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Monica Camera Obscura.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:I'll Get There advertisement.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of the book featured? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:28, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete derivative work of the ad. Nothing suggests PD. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:33, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a copyrighted work that fails the non free criteria, since the article it is used in already has a WP:NFC book cover. --DBig Xrayᗙ 14:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gloria Jean, 1938.tif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a self work, Book is too recent to assume it wasn't renewed. What is the situation on the copyright of pre 1978 screen test footage? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless new information surfaces. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:32, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Renault Fuego GTS 1981, covered in snow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One name listed in license, another in the history. Who actually made this? Lo res, and otherwise unused. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:06, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Haywyre au Fairmount.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:16, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haywyre au Fairmount.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Low quality - The image is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns (JPEG compression and grain). I will attempt to replace this image with a suitable one freely licensed soon as I have contact with the Artist. The uploader of the original image has been blocked from editing wikipedia, so I cannot give due notice on their talk page. B4shful (talk) 17:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.