Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 July 24

< July 23	July 25 >

July 24

File:Walk With Elias.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no legit fair use rationale, no other article on Wikipedia has this image. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 00:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Am I missing something? There is a detailed non-free usage rationale provided. And per WP:NFCC#10c, there should not be usage of this image in other articles. --Whpq (talk) 10:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nomination made by an eager, but uninformed, new user. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Erm it is used here WWE: Walk With Elias --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 21:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Meghana Lokesh.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected copyvio as it looks like a cropped screenshot from something, but I can't find what from. stwalkerster (talk) 08:19, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Uploader has a history of copyright violations. This image does not have camera EXIF data, but instead is from some software, likely screen grab software. Uploader appears to also have requested deletion. --Whpq (talk) 10:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete /media/wikipedia/en/archive/3/37/20180724161131%21Meghana_Lokesh.png deffo looks like it's from a movie or video but can't find anything using Google reverse image search --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 21:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anchor Ravi Image.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected copyvio, looks like a cropped screenshot from somewhere but can't find where stwalkerster (talk) 08:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Rather have this on COM then delete it...TJH2018 talk 18:43, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Las Pinas, Philippines Saltern Circa 1890-1920 U.S. Library Of Congress Cropped.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 August 1. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Las Pinas, Philippines Saltern Circa 1890-1920 U.S. Library Of Congress Cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deakin University Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 August 1. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deakin University Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NetIQs Logo May 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Querying ineligibility , given the logo elements (non-trival) left. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:57, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Looks to technical to fall below the TOO. Salavat (talk) 13:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to non-free per the above. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Korean Democratic Labor Party (logo).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 August 1. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Korean Democratic Labor Party (logo).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VicCricketers1877.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No obvious source, but clearly PD by age, an artist working in 1877 is clearly not necessarily going to still be alive in 1946. Bringing this to FFD because the 1955 claim is typically for photos, not for artwork which should ideally have an identifiable artist. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:23, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JJKellyCigCard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Pre 1955 rule is generally applied to photos or anon works. The media here is a cigarette card which would have an identifiable (corporate) author? Almost certainly PD by age but felt a clarfication was needed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ddoff lights.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality picture. Other pictures of the same brand already exist in Commons. —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 09:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:16Mb Disgo flash drive.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

low-quality image of USB flash drive, superior images available on commons Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is one of the first USB flash drives to hit the market. Should probably put it back into the history section of the article Towel401 (talk) 21:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and transfer to Commons. This isn't the best quality image, but it would be perfectly usable if one wanted to use it to illustrate 16MB Disgo flash drive. -- Whpq (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and transfer to Commons per above. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:09, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:103-5 KISSFM.jpg.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by File:TheNew103-5KissFM.png Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to PNG. Salavat (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABC ME logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

non-free, logo is above the threshold of originality - see File:ABC ME logo.svg Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aarti Chabria Photo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

web-quality image, no EXIF data. Unlikely to be uploader's own work as claimed. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:36, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is not "web quality" when the image resolution is 1,350 × 2,080. On Commons, File:Aarti Chhabria.jpg has an OTRS ticket. Based on this comment on the uploader's usertalk page at Commons, they may have some sort of associaiton with the photo;s subject, and but it also seems unlikely that they are the actual copyright holder. OTRS permission would be needed to confirm. There may also be a violation of paid editting. -- Whpq (talk) 15:34, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abu booth cabsat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

too low in quality to be of educational value Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:38, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AdamsSchoolFindlay2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

poor-quality photo, superseded by File:Adams School from SSW, facing NNE.JPG Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adelina.sotnika rostelecom cup 2011.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

web-quality file, inconsistent metadata with user's other uploads. No evidence of permission/no source Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Polina Korobeynikova.Grand Prix Final.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

web-quality file, inconsistent metadata with user's other uploads. No evidence of permission/no source Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.