Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 April 29

< April 28	April 30 >

April 29

File:'It Looked as if a Night of Dark Intent was Coming' by Murray Turnbull.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

fails WP:NFCC#8, no critical discussion of the image in the article it is used in FASTILY 05:48, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The painting is mentioned as an example of the artist's work and style for which he is known, but there is no significant commentary about this specific work, nor is there significant commentary about the artist's style for which one might use this particular painting as an example. -- Whpq (talk) 00:47, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CNET infection malware.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a copyright violation of a VirusTotal website. VirusTotal website is not under public domain or a free license. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:C1C6:47D6:2DA1:EB05 (talk) 15:30, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-free screenshot that could easily be replaced with text. Salavat (talk) 12:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Non-free images on Mars in fiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove from non-parent articles. ℯ xplicit 06:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Used on Mars in fiction to represent the works described in the text, failing WP:NFCC#3a. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remove all four images from the Mars in fiction article, their use in this article is purely decorative. File:MartianTimeSlip(1stEd).jpg should also be removed from Martian. File:CSLewis OutOfTheSilentPlanet.jpg could also be argued to be removed from The Space Trilogy as it isn't exactly the primary usage of the book cover. Salavat (talk) 13:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Remove from all articles other than the ones about the four specific literary works. Deor (talk) 15:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Non-free images in Nebulae in fiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 01:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fail WP:NFCC#3a, 8. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:35, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.