Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 April 2

< April 1	April 3 >

April 2

Non-free Las Vegas Stadium images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete the first file, keep the second. ℯ xplicit 06:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two non-free images of the proposed Las Vegas Stadium are being used in the article. Together, they fail WP:NFCC#3a. As the stadium does not yet exists, a single non-free image for the article would be acceptable. My personal opinion is to keep File:Las Vegas Stadium.jpg as it better illustrates the article and delete File:Las Vegas Raiders stadium.jpg. However, I have no strong objection to it being the other way around. Whpq (talk) 02:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I was following the same protocol that was used with the multiple images on Mercedes-Benz Stadium which has three non-free images, two of which were there before stadium construction started to illustrate special features which I was attempting to do here. If I was mistaken than I would like to keep File:Las Vegas Stadium.jpg as I as well think it is the better one. Mo2010 (talk) 3:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

@Mo2010: I believe the reason for that on Mercedes-Benz Stadium is to display the unique roof, circular scoreboard at the top, and the curtain system. Elisfkc (talk) 19:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: I was doing this to display the unique torch and retractable windows. What I was asking was what the difference is? Mo2010 (talk) 1:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

@Mo2010: That image be used to both highlight the torch and serve as the primary means of identification in the infobox. -- Whpq (talk) 12:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vkernel-logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 07:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prem chand aggarwal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Professional photograph, copyright is that of photographer not client. – Train2104 (t • c) 17:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LyrisGoldn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

low-quality image from long-since abandoned userspace draft. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.