Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 November 3
| < November 2 | November 4 > |
|---|
November 3
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Scause South Park.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Canadaolympic989 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Invalid FUR--not discussed critically, but purely decorative. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:27, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bradley Manning in elementary school.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SlimVirgin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unneeded non free image. Rettetast (talk) 08:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I can't see a problem with it. It's in the section about his childhood, and it was given GA status with the image in it. SlimVirgin (talk) 17:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:NFCC#8 "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." A picture of the person in question during their childhood in no way increases understanding, especially since it is just a portrait of the person as a child. Nor would it take away from the article if it was not there as there is no specific information relating to the photo, including no age nor description of why the photo would be significant. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 04:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jesse Marsch.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Delta JT (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Copyright violation, this is an AFP photo Il faut regarder (talk) 14:48, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:19, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Monzb.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MKY661 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
PD-text logo, only really used for decorative purposes. Cloudbound (talk) 22:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because this functionally illustrates a former logo used by Monarch Airlines within the Monarch Airlines article. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Decorative use is only an issue to WP:NFCC#8, but this logo is
{{PD-ineligible-USonly|the United Kingdom}}, so it is fine. Any decision on whether the image should be included in the article or not is an editorial decision and is better handled on the article talk page. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Syfy.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Totalaero (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
There is already a better PNG version of the SyFy logo used on other articles, so this image is no longer needed. NoeG2012 talk to me, baby 22:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.