Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 June 5

< June 4	June 6 >

June 5

File:Hunter-allan noah-newman-yr.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3a in the article Noah Newman: there is already a different image, File:Kevin Schmidt as Noah.jpg, of the character in this article. Fails WP:NFCC#1 in the article Hunter Allan: the person is still alive. Stefan2 (talk) 09:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It represents a past actor who has portrayed the role, which is what we show in soap articles. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 22:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Both images are pretty different (a reason why it doesn't completely fulfills WP:NFCC#1) and shows both different stages of the actor and the character. —Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 03:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Image is of just one of the many actors who have played the same role. Adds little to readers' understanding of the topic to see this extra image. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:39, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LukeKleintank Noah-NewmanYR.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The files fail WP:NFCC#3a: there is already a different image, File:Kevin Schmidt as Noah.jpg, of the character in the article. Stefan2 (talk) 09:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Doshisha-emblem.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by MGA73 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

tagged as "Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons. This image is believed to be non-free or possibly non-free in its home country, Japan. In order for Commons to host a file, it must be free in its home country and in the United States. Some countries, particularly other countries based on common law, have a lower threshold of originality than the United States.", kept on commons, please delete as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 14:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CzechWikipedia 20071129.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Useless, unused Bulwersator (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DC-8 3-view.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DC-8_3-view.jpg (but there is a different file format) Bulwersator (talk) 15:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Formats are irrelevant. —Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 03:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evan Guajardo Wrye 1.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan userpage image MGA73 (talk) 16:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FH000024.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of a horse. No good description. MGA73 (talk) 16:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gazora.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan userpage image. MGA73 (talk) 16:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Keivy3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image. Not usable? MGA73 (talk) 16:36, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I find no way we could use this image. —Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 03:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Killer´s playbox.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Not usable? MGA73 (talk) 16:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Without article, useless Bulwersator (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. —Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 03:30, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oscar-12-25-05 1211-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of a cat. It is low res. Probably an orphan userpage image. MGA73 (talk) 16:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as YA cat Bulwersator (talk) 16:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What's "YA cat"? Anyway I moved the image to Commons. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 19:07, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Piranesicarceri.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Without source and description, unused Bulwersator (talk) 16:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An 18th-century etching by Giovanni Battista Piranesi. Delete it if you want: I no longer contribute images to Wikipedia.--Wetman (talk) 16:50, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to Commons. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 19:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as now-commons but not per nom (instead a mild trouting for not noticing that the file page has stated "Piranesi, Le carceri etching...18th century etching" since 2004). DMacks (talk) 00:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Norman Smith.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I attempted to contact the uploader but he has not logged in since March. The summary description of this image can't be correct. The description says the image is "self made" (as in the uploader created it), and the image is from 1965. However, the uploader's userpage says he was born in 1966, which would have made him roughtly a year old at the time theimage was taken. More likely, the image was scanned or cropped from another source, making this an unlicensed derivative and likely copyvio. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 18:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If the image is that old, would it be difficult to find it on the Web? —Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 03:33, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- As the image was probably scanned or cropped from another source - yes Bulwersator (talk) 08:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sharon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan userpage image (I think) MGA73 (talk) 19:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pasaporte español.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Blurred. No longer usable? MGA73 (talk) 19:17, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment is the license correct? Does the Spanish government make its passport CC and GFDL licensed? 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. Perhaps uploader think that the passport is PD (old/ineligible). --MGA73 (talk) 17:50, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete According to Coat of arms of Spain, the current version of the coat of arms is from 1981. Fails Commons:COM:COA#Coat of arms "found on the internet". --Stefan2 (talk) 18:16, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FW - Alma Logo.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No forseen usage. MGA73 (talk) 19:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Irrelevant image with no future usage. —Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 03:38, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Topsy turvey.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No forseen usage. MGA73 (talk) 19:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Faceoff.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No forseen usage. Copyrighted logo? MGA73 (talk) 19:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cover for the Upcoming 2012 album; Musa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the official cover of the album, since it hasn't been show yet. Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 21:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It is the official coming soon artwork posted on Ivy's official FB and Twitter. When the regular artwork is released then the coming soon artwork can be used as the alternate cover in the infobox. DivaKnockouts (talk) 02:16, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Coming soon" artwork? It is the first time ever i hear that word, and i've been here for more than 4 years. There's no "coming soon" artworks permitted here on WP, or it is the cover that will be on the physical or digital download (both standard or deluxe or whatever name the artist puts on the disc), or it is nothing worth to note on the article's infobox. "Coming soon" sounds like a promotional advertisement, and we don't need them, this is an encyclopedia, not a magazine. --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 02:26, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haha... wow. Whatever. Delete Probally dont even listen to Ivy. DivaKnockouts (talk) 03:05, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do listen to Ivy Queen. I'm latin american. But that's not the point. We have to follow the rules of the english Wikipedia. --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 03:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is ridiculous. A promotional "coming soon" cover? Statυs (talk) 02:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.