Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 September 27
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
September 27
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Village.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Glennsmart (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, no encyclopedic use Admrboltz (talk) 00:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There are four versions, all completely different, so maybe it should be protected as a generic image name. The first, by Glennsmart, was also uploaded as File:Bothalvillage.jpg. The second, by Yankfan1950, looks like it is copied from a game, but unless the subject can be identified, it isn't useful and its copyright status is unknown. The third, uploaded by Baggy5706, is possibly useful, and the article Glanwydden doesn't have an image, but it is low resolution and a better image could probably be found or made. The fourth version, by Bilal4us, was in the article Kamalpur Musa for several months, but isn't useful as a picture of the village and it's unlikely to be useful (unless on a user page, but the user hasn't created one and appears to have no edits in the last six months). snigbrook (talk) 12:16, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:EBMA PICTURE 2008 .gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NICKNEWTON (notify | contribs).
- Logos like this are generally non-free. Orphaned. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 00:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Each of the individual photographs which makes up this composite should have source information. PhilKnight (talk) 09:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sri Lankan Home Guardsmen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nitraven (notify | contribs).
- I'm having a hard time believing that there is no free equivalent is available, or could be created. Looks like living persons as well and really doesn't seem to add to the article that much. Also, very doubtful as a historical picture. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:34, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tried to google search and these same pics came up.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 17:22, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Willking1979 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tvbuzz screenshot 1.40 am September 16.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wildhartlivie (notify | contribs).
- Uploader requested. Uploaded to illustrate point in discussion and no longer needed. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:CSD#G7.--Rockfang (talk) 08:56, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.