Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 November 10

< November 9	November 11 >

November 10

File:Photo-0025.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo-0025.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Grfc2007 (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude ► 03:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Photo-00256.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo-00256.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Grfc2007 (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude ► 03:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Project Dunks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Project Dunks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Williams306 (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude ► 03:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kalimera China Album Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalimera China Album Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jijifiongos (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude ► 04:15, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Grigoris for china.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grigoris for china.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jijifiongos (notify | contribs).

OR, UE, blurred & too dark to be of use Skier Dude ► 04:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lioncomplex.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lioncomplex.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Liontafari (notify | contribs).

Awful image, belonging to an article that's about to be speedily deleted. Drmies (talk) 05:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Top gear australia tv ratings.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Keep - its a free image that is used in an article. Use in the article is a matter for editorial discussion rather than a deletion discussion- Peripitus (Talk) 03:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Top gear australia tv ratings.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Greglocock (notify | contribs).

POV, misleading, ungrounded speculation. Anyone with a basic understanding of statistics (and quite a few without too) will see that the regression curve makes no sense. Take out the first point for debut hype, and it becomes clear that the low point is either an outlier or a typo in the source data. A trendline closer to the horizontal is a better fit. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 07:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- The article claims that the rating for the first episode is worthy of discussion. The graph accepts that as a valid point and includes it. If the consensus is that the rating of the first episode is not statistically relevant then the article also needs to be modified in that light. As discussed once or twice elsewhere, in fact that number of outliers is to be expected in a normal distribution. So, what statistically valid process do you have for eliminating it as a member of the set? Your call. Greglocock (talk) 10:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In fact how could a graph that excludes points not be OR, unless someone in an RS had supplied a rationale for excluding some points? I took points from a reasonable source, if not an RS, and applied the simplest possible analysis. Greglocock (talk) 11:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Applying that analysis was OR on your part. Show us a source that suggests a downward trend, because the raw data points alone don't suggest one. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 15:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one suggesting ignoring datapoints, not me. I have included the full dataset. The article discusses the full dataset. I imagine digging up a discussion of the trend is not beyond google, eg http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0,26278,24459517-5016681,00.html or http://www.themotorreport.com.au/11122/top-gear-australia-ratings-has-the-aussie-version-found-reverse/

Greglocock (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant. The trendline you have added is OR on your part. It suggests a declining trend, when a basic analysis suggests that there isn't one. Looking at the source you provided, the real figures actually show a substantial increase. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 12:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The obvious analysis I applied is to use all the datapoints in the set. It requires extra knwoldege to discard one point. The article makes hay out of the point under contention. Greglocock (talk) 23:35, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've missed the point. The problem is that you applied the analysis. This is what makes it OR. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 09:58, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear on this, one source you linked to identified the first five, over which it would be reasonable to infer a downward trend, however, you have three additional points which negate the trend.

No, they confirm it. To negate the trend they would have to change the slop to positive. they don't.

I'm confused how three points that are substantially higher could possibly confirm a downward trend. Disregard the highest and lowest result (a common technique), and you get a near-horizontal line. Adding a trend line in this context is inherently POV, since one can apply any rules to get a line that supports the statement you want to make. In this case, by taking this extra step, you can get three conflicting conclusions - an increasing audience, a steady audience, and a decreasing audience. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 09:58, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The other source compares only the first two points. Again, anyone with the most basic knowledge will happily accept that a reduction from episode 1 to episode 2 is pretty much standard. You can't infer anything from it in the same way that you can't infer from it being colder today than yesterday that winter has arrived. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 12:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I gave those as examples of where the trend was discussed, as you requested "Show us a source that suggests a downward trend, ". I found two in one minute of searching.Greglocock (talk) 23:35, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You found two that were horrendously out-of-date even at the time frame of your graph. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 09:58, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. There again, I fulfilled your request. Greglocock (talk) 10:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall requesting "sources which might support the claim if you twist both them and the claim enough". 81.111.114.131 (talk) 14:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This what you wrote "Show us a source that suggests a downward trend, ". I did that. Stop whining. Greglocock (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question - Could an similar image be made without the "forecast" data? That could possibly remove any original research issue.--Rockfang (talk) 10:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is a good idea. I will do that next week. Greglocock (talk) 10:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding any trend line itself might still be POV. Since we now have more ratings info available (I certainly found them up to the end of 2008, doubtless they'll be there for the entire run by now), it would be dishonest to merely reproduce the current chart without the additional data since that to me smacks of furthering the opinion of a decline which later turned out not to be the case. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 14:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to include the entire data set. Since you are so keen on this perhaps you could tabulate it for me, my time is limited, yours appears not to be? Just tell me where you've put it. Greglocock (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Knight on SI.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knight on SI.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Quadzilla99 (notify | contribs).

Although appearance on the cover is mentioned in the article (albeit not in any detail), there is no mention or discussion of the cover image itself. It is possible to let readers know that he appeared on the cover without actually showing the cover, fails WP:NFCC#1 and #8. Mosmof (talk) 15:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JoeMauerSI.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JoeMauerSI.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by .mdk. (notify | contribs).

Although appearance on the cover is mentioned in the article (albeit not in any detail), there is no mention or discussion of the cover image itself. It is possible to let readers know that he appeared on the cover without actually showing the cover, fails WP:NFCC#1 and #8. Mosmof (talk) 15:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2004 B&W Promo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2004 B&W Promo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SaladGoat (notify | contribs).

This is described as an official publicity photo. Publicity photos are ordinarily works-for-hire, and the copyright is held by the person who commissioned it, typically the subject or his/her representative. The copyright release here is provided under the claim of being the photographer, and there is no OTRS confirmation. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bolton Abbey spring 2007.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0006.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Barnsey313 (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - ok quality photo of Bolton Abbey - renamed now and tagged to move to commons - Peripitus (Talk) 02:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The file was moved from File:HPIM0006.JPG to File:Bolton Abbey spring 2007.JPG by Peripitus (talk · contribs) at 02:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM0052.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0052.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Monogram (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM0053.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0053.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Blueman102 (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM0058.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0058.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Monogram (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM0061.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0061.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lowell978 (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM0064.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0064.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lowell978 (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM0070.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0070.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lowell978 (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM0078.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0078.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Monogram (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alan Haynes, 2007.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0080.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xbrianm (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Aaaaaaaaaaaagh. It is a good quality photo of an encyclopedic subject (Alan Haynes) that is (now) not orphaned and the image page did state the use. The only problem was that it was not correctly named. Keep of course and move to commons where free images belong. - Peripitus (Talk) 02:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The file was moved from File:HPIM0080.JPG to File:Alan Haynes, 2007.JPG by Peripitus (talk · contribs) at 02:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:CSD#F8.--Rockfang (talk) 18:11, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM0114.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0114.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joast (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM0142.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0142.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Monogram (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM0150.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0150.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Monogram (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM0238.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM0238.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vic0 (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM2018.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM2018.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TerriermonX (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Class 66 no. 66106 - 2007.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM2014.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to commons. Quality is adequate, it is an encyc subject, and the image page states its use "Class 66 no. 66106 at Doncaster on 3rd November 2007" for someone writing about the Class 66s this image could be useful. - Peripitus (Talk) 02:30, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The file was moved from File:HPIM2014.JPG to File:Class 66 no. 66106 - 2007.JPG by Peripitus (talk · contribs) at 02:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM2010.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM2010.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1925.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1925.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1913.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1913.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1905.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1905.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1859jpeg.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1859jpeg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scamper (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1859.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1859.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1850.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1850.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1796.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1796.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adriarroyo (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1785.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1785.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Swati Mridu (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1724.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1724.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1697.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1697.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1696.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1696.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1656.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1656.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1598.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1598.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ACBest (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1446.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1446.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NavyKitten (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPIM1177.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM1177.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yussef90 (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vb111.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vb111.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sureshiras (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0066.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0066.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by VenkatShanmugam (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0074.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0074.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sandyshares (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0097 2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0097 2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Finnsterr (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:46, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0134.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0134.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Keuka542 (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:46, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0145-cropped.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0145-cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dvdmoe (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:46, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0153.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0153.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kirat rai (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0185.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0185.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mohit Nahata (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0186.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0186.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mg rotc2487 (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0225.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0225.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bulava (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0252.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0252.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sandyshares (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0256.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0256.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sandyshares (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0297.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0297.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JorgeGT (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC 0314.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:38, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0314.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by James bme (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to commons. Good quality image of (as stated on the image page) "Jimmy Page's London home, Tower House, April 6, 2006"... If we delete this and someone wants to write an article about Tower House or discussing it's architecture we'll look silly. - Peripitus (Talk) 02:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flint River aquarium entrance.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0425.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Streamer47 (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to commons. Apart from the shoddy editing on the grass (look around the edge) it is a very good quality photo of .........check the sign on the front of the building......its the Flint RiverQuarium - Peripitus (Talk) 02:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The file was moved from File:DSC 0425.JPG to File:Flint River aquarium entrance.JPG by Peripitus (talk · contribs) at 02:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Royal Oak Offshore watch by Audemars Piguet.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File is no longer orphaned. — ξ ^xplicit 19:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)}}[reply]

File:DSC 0544nmnm.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eternalsleeper (notify | contribs).

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 19:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to commons. High quality, encyclopedic, yes it is orphaned, use is stated (on the image page it says "Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore" which is the brand and model of the watch). Acutally I've unorphaned it and placed in Audemars Piguet as it seemed better than the existing image - Peripitus (Talk) 02:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The file was moved from File:DSC 0544nmnm.JPG to File:Royal Oak Offshore watch by Audemars Piguet.JPG by Peripitus (talk · contribs) at 02:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or tranwiki to Commons. Any problems that might have existed seem to have been fixed.KTo288 (talk) 19:22, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ONGC Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ONGC Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jovianeye (notify | contribs).

replaced PNG with SVG version Jovianeye (talk) 21:15, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:E-meter red.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Cirt (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:E-meter red.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Llaardvargk (notify | contribs).

Wikipedia is not censored. File has been replaced in mainspace with a new photo that is not censored. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:38, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kirk-shoots-Spock.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kirk-shoots-Spock.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tilden76 (notify | contribs).

This file was to identify a memorable scene in a television episode. The image of this scene is not important to our understanding of the episode, which can be easily understood without it. Alastairward (talk) 22:17, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ONGC FC Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ONGC FC Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shovon76 (notify | contribs).

ONGC Logo.svg Jovianeye (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NamSangMi Font.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NamSangMi Font.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JKSarang (notify | contribs).

Apparently copyrighted and being used under a claim of fair use, so the CC license is invalid. Does not meet fair use requirements as it has no contextual significance to the article Nam Sang Mi and could be replaced with a free alternative. PC78 (talk) 23:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry wrong license was used. It will be changed. JKSarang 04:10, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Keep. The font is discussed critically in the article. Accordingly, it does meet the fair use requirements. While it probably does not have the technically correct non-free template applied to it, there is a rationale on the file page, and the license tag has been corrected from CC. —C.Fred (talk) 04:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wbkb weather.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wbkb weather.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Strafidlo (notify | contribs).

Fair-use image of a living person, doesn't add significantly to the network's article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:57, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.