Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 June 30
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
June 30
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete (F1). I'm not sure why we're discussing this here. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fightstar Birmingham 061007.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by LostLikeTearsInRain (notify | contribs).
- Uploader claims PD-self, but this is an exact duplicate of the previously-uploaded File:Fightstar Birmingham 2007.JPG, which was uploaded by another user under free licenses, not PD. Suggest replacing sole use with the other copy and deleting this image. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AnonymousDemotivator.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kaiba (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, LQ, and possible CV. File is trying to redo Image:AnonymousDemotivator.jpg in SVG format, but is missing details (like sleeve wrinkles) and text. Original file is classified as logo, so GDFL probably shouldn't apply here either. RabidDeity (talk) 06:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- non-free image for which a free alternative (File:Ramos Pentagon.jpg) exists - replaceable with this free image and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 06:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RamosInauguration.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Democraticsystem (notify | contribs).
- non-free image used to simply show somone took an oath. Does not significantly increase reader's understanding and so fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 06:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: - Speedy Deleted as a webscraped copyright violation - Peripitus (Talk) 00:42, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Author Amanda Hallay.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SebastianBaker (notify | contribs).
Orphaned,unencyclopedic. It appears this user already tried to upload this photo twice, and the file was deleted both times. RabidDeity (talk) 09:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]Keep- not orphaned any more....it's Amanda Hallay - Peripitus (Talk) 10:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for linking the article into the photo. Still, the image is tagged both PD and GFDL, the image size is of a strange size (cropped?), and there's no EXIF data. This makes me doubt whether the user actually took the image... but that's a separate issue. I also still have my doubts as to whether or not the subject matter for the article is notable but that's also a separate issue (which you've also addressed). Well done. RabidDeity (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmmm - I think I found the source - http://lh6.ggpht.com/_b-FSau-o5xU/Si_mx6EvpHI/AAAAAAAAAC0/cSiWGpunTBc/Author%20Amanda%20Hallay.jpg. Uploaded by amanda Hallay and marked as (c) All rights reserved.....webscraped copyvio possibly - Peripitus (Talk) 00:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned, and low quality (horizontal distortion?) RabidDeity (talk) 09:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Deprecated by SVG version Papa November (talk) 09:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Deprecated by higher-res image at Commons Papa November (talk) 09:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Deprecated by high-res version at Commons Papa November (talk) 09:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Helmstedt district coa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Baldhur (notify | contribs).
- Deprecated by SVG version Papa November (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I fail to see why the cover of the sampler is needed. The main infobox already has an image of the actual cover, this one is not needed. J Milburn (talk) 11:22, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree - jayy008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.73.251.8 (talk) 16:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Houseseason5cast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andrewcrawford (notify | contribs).
- I fail to see what an image of the cast of the most recent season is actually adding to the article. How does knowing what the cast looks like allow us to better understand a list of the episodes? J Milburn (talk) 11:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As per the peer review [1] it was suggest to add a image to the article. This is what i thought would be the best option. Other List articles have some sort of thumb image at the top of the page, Maybe this si not the best option but i personal can not think of anything else that might do--Andy (talk - contrib) 12:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That suggestion was made by an automated script, so it should be taken with a grain of salt. I agree with J Milburn, if an image is inserted into the article it should be somewhat informative. This image is not informative to the single article it appears in, nor is it free-use. Delete. --RabidDeity (talk) 21:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I feel that the photo, although not integral to the article, is useful even if it is just for the simple reason of knowing what the cast looks like. What is the harm in knowing what the cast look like. If the picture had links to the individual character biographies included which would give the picture greater purpose then what is the harm in having the photo in the article. There has been no violation in the accuracy or integraty of the article so why go to the trouble of raising this debate for the sake of quibiling over inconciquential content. "Philip J. Hawkins" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phil John Hawkins (talk • contribs) 15:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete This file is simply an inferior duplicate of this file: File:HouseSeason5Cast.jpg. They even have the same filename. This image is currently being used under fair use in List of House characters, which is the most appropriate place for it. But the file here is pretty much a duplicate. LonelyMarble (talk) 15:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Since it is a copy which i was not aware of when i uploaded then i say, what do you mean by inferior by the way? Delete--Andy (talk - contrib) 19:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Deprecated by LaTeX markup: <math>\rtimes</math>, (for example
) Papa November (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Source is not verifiable. I can't find a picture of Ricouer on LOC's site. Damiens.rf 17:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, and uncaptioned. Possibly unencyclopedic; what does this image show? RabidDeity (talk) 20:01, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Beddgelertdragon.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lleifior (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no description given, unencyclopedic. As far as I can tell it's a photo of an inn in Wales, but beyond that I'm not sure where it would go. RabidDeity (talk) 21:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PresidentGloriaArroyo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Democraticsystem (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image copied from a myspace page used to show what some politician looks like (but we have free alternatives available for that) Damiens.rf 21:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This curious family picture is not helpful for the understanding of those articles. Damiens.rf 21:18, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, probably unencyclopedic. No description given. This is a really big file that doesn't seem to serve any purpose. RabidDeity (talk) 21:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.