Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 June 29
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
June 29
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FIFA10.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Devoindahouse (notify | contribs).
- Fake video game cover incorporates copyrighted logos and (likely) copyvio images without source information. Orphaned and unencyclopedic. Mosmof (talk) 00:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; not used, looks like a trademark violation, and probably a copyright violation as well. There's upside to keeping. TJRC (talk) 21:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jacobbl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Izabella Ane (notify | contribs).
- Image is fan-made, not an official poster. Andrea (talk) 06:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Romanian adi.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Iadrian yu (notify | contribs).
- The image has been renamed to File:RomanianTerritories.png per request by User:Scooter20. Jafeluv (talk) 11:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Enfield High School A and B Buildings 2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mirandalovely (notify | contribs).
- Delete: this is a low resolution version of File:Enfield High School A and B Buildings.JPG which is unlikely ever to be used. ww2censor (talk) 13:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC) ww2censor (talk) 13:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Enfield High School.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mirandalovely (notify | contribs).
- Delete: this is a low resolution version of File:Enfield High School facade.jpg which is unlikely ever to be used. ww2censor (talk) 13:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn as image was changed. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair-use image that includes a living person. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP I fixed the size of the photo, so it looks fine.--Subman758 (talk) 20:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The size isn't important. The fact of the matter is that it's a non-free image of a living person. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: - Delete - image fails NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 03:27, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gashbellost1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Through fire and flames (notify | contribs).
- Album cover in an article about a fictional character. Adds little; the use of a non-free image is not required. The cover itself is not discussed. J Milburn (talk) 21:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The album cover is not in an article about a fictional character. The article is about the series in general. Purpose of the image is to show the cd cover of first soundtrack which is discussed in the CDs section where the image is.--Through fire and flames (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep.DragonZero (talk) 21:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Album covers can be used in the article about the album. However, using them in unrelated articles requires a very unusual rationale, which I don't see here. Stifle (talk) 20:45, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. In the context of another non-free image in the article, this doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 13:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Creator seems to have tried to nominate this for deletion, but it could have been done in confusion based on all the reverts in such in the page hist. Thoughts? –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.