Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 July 12
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
July 12
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sabrina Morris.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stoletheshow (notify | contribs).
- Delete: Orphaned image associated with the article Sabrina Morris that was deleted 5 times between December 26, 2006 and June 11, 2009. See uploader's talk page. ww2censor (talk) 04:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Salman awdah.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kamtanoli375 (notify | contribs).
- Delete: Uploader is most likely not the copyright holder of this image which can be found on several websites with tineye posted there long before the upload to this wiki. ww2censor (talk) 04:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete as nn-bio. Stifle (talk) 10:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mdkkkkk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Michelle32 (notify | contribs).
- A seemingly good way to circumvent your article regarding some non-notable entity (most likely you) being deleted, create an image of the content of the article and use that instead. Personally, I'd hold this to the same conditions I would hold to an article given it is an article as is the summary for the file but it is just an image and even a PD one shouldn't stick around if in some way it is a doing a sly endrun around notability policies. treelo radda 13:46, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sutcliffe and Kirchherr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andreasegde (notify | contribs).
- What these two looked like together is not important. There are already images of each of them in their respective articles, this one is not required. Note that I am not saying that the relationship should not be covered, I'm saying I'm not seeing any justification for using this image. J Milburn (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Obsolete and Low quality; replaced by Image:Sora_logo.svg.
Note that uploader seems to be busy and may not be able to check notices.Kakurady (talk) 15:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Oh shoot. I just got back today - thanks for reminding me to remove the travel notice.
As for the image, just stick a {{superceded}} template on it instead of deletion to archive it.Never mind, delete. I forgot the logo was non-free. --haha169 (talk) 15:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh shoot. I just got back today - thanks for reminding me to remove the travel notice.
- Comment - I've tagged the file with {{Di-orphaned fair use}}.--Rockfang (talk) 19:55, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lullabybystarsailor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alvaro3043 (notify | contribs).
- Image is just decorative, there is no critical commentary. Polly (Parrot) 20:57, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 as the image does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. — Σxplicit 19:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: The image is used in the article section giving a visual description of James Walsh in the music video of the song. It illustrates the description of the video un the section "Music Video" for Lullaby —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.96.188.91 (talk) 20:56, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.