Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 23
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
February 23
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by East718 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Optimized image 4cb8c844.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs).
- Renamed file uploaded. (ThatGameCompany_Logo.png) ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 00:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 03:49, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: problem solved -- lucasbfr talk 10:14, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Its a legitimate image of a sculpture. The artist is identified...only the location is missing. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why keep it around on Wikipedia if it's not being used anywhere? This isn't Commons. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Gee, if only there was some way to move an image to Commons... Technology has failed us again! ~ JohnnyMrNinja 10:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MarlenaEvansBlack2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kdog5592 (notify | contribs).
- replaceable with free image File:Deidrehall.jpg - no special costume etc for the character and the free image of the actress appears more than adequate. Peripitus (Talk) 03:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- SPEEDY DELETE Invalid fair use claim. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 01:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:34, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Meserle-shooting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wayne shoter (notify | contribs).
- No evidence actual photographer released into public domain. Superm401 - Talk 05:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or change rationale - This is a frame grab from a video and there's zero evidence it has been released in the PD nor that the uploader is the copyright holder. I believe this image could be kept under a fair use rationale as it is iconic of the incident. --Marc Kupper|talk 10:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Images cannot be used under fair use unless the actual copyright holder is attributed, per WP:NFCC#10a. Uploader removed a non-free dispute tag without addressing the actual issue. Stifle (talk) 11:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've deleted the image since the copyright holder, if any, is unknown and I've not a clue as to how much time it might take to get and reliably source a name. Thanks for keeping after this and nudging me about it. The image was uploaded years ago when we weren't so stern about this, so I find this outcome understandable. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PMheadshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by marsmanager (notify | contribs).
- obsolete Marsmanager (talk) 17:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PMpegasus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by marsmanager (notify | contribs).
- obsolete Marsmanager (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PM 5771.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by marsmanager (notify | contribs).
- obsolete Marsmanager (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PM 5783.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by marsmanager (notify | contribs).
- obsolete Marsmanager (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Its almost useless today. The subject is not even identified...unless its Bob Dylan. I doubt the uploader even holds the copyright to the image. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PM 5798.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by marsmanager (notify | contribs).
- obsolete Marsmanager (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PM 5828.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by marsmanager (notify | contribs).
- obsolete Marsmanager (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Elise.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MadameDeSade (notify | contribs).
- Self-portrait of non-contributing editor from 2006. No encyclopedic value to speak of. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 19:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I concur with nominator's reasons. Its the uploader's second image...of herself. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GypsyElise.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MadameDeSade (notify | contribs).
- Self-portrait of non-contributing editor from 2006. No encyclopedic value to speak of. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 19:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per vanity and abscence of notability. It has no use today. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Lucasbfr (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kyogen Carlson.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mind meal (notify | contribs).
- Photo of non-notable abbot used in deleted article. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 21:34, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If nothing else, this image can be useful to illustrate kesa (clothing) (I believe the rakusu is a type of kesa??) Crypticfirefly (talk) 01:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment if it can be shown to serve a valid purpose I will certainly withdraw the nomination. I am not familiar with robe types. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 08:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added the image to that article, and moved it to Commons at File:Kyogen Carlson - Buddhist abbot in kesa robe.jpg. So now it's CSD F8. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 10:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- [1] listed as a fair use image. Replacable non-free image. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 21:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
![[1]](/wiki/File:Amelia-Stemma.png){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Low quality logo for product that does not have an article. No encyclopedic value. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 22:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This uploader's sole image here is today orphaned. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.