Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates

Skip to:

Table of contents
Current nominations
To be closed
More input needed
Recently closed
Suspended candidates

This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.

Promoting an image

If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.

All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here.

The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results.

If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.

Delisting an image

A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture.

For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance.

Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.

Note that delisting an image does not mean deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article(s).

Shortcuts

Featured content:

Featured picture tools:

Step 1:
Evaluate

Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations.

Step 2:
Create a subpage

For Nominations

To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.

For Delists

To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.

For Delist and replace

To create a subpage for your delist and replace, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.

Step 3:
Transclude and link

Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list (direct link).

How to comment for Candidate Images

Write Support, if you approve of the picture. A reason is optional.
Write Oppose, followed by your reasoning, if you disapprove of the picture. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image. If your concern is one that can only be addressed by the creator, and if they haven't nominated or commented on the image, and if they are a Wikipedian, you should notify them directly.
You can weak support or weak oppose instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
- To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
If you think a nominated image obviously fails the featured picture criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case.

Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly.

Prior to giving an opinion, the image should be assessed on its quality as displayed at full size (high-resolution) in an image editing program. Please note that the images are only displayed at thumbnail size on this page. The thumbnail links to the image description page which, in turn, links to the high-resolution version.

How to comment for Delist Images

Write Keep, followed by your reasons for keeping the picture.
Write Delist, followed by your reasons for delisting the picture.
Write Delist and Replace if you believe the image should be replaced by a better picture.
You can weak keep, weak delist or weak delist and replace instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
- To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.

Please remember to be civil, not to bite the newbies and to comment on the image, not the person.

You may find the glossary useful when you encounter acronyms or jargon in other voters' comments. You can also link to it by using {{FPCgloss}}.

Editing candidates

If you feel you could improve a candidate by image editing, please feel free to do so, but do not overwrite or remove the original. Instead, upload your edit with a different file name (e.g., add "edit" to the file name), and display it below the original nomination. Edits should be appropriately captioned in sequential order (e.g., Edit 1, Edit 2, etc), and describe the modifications that have been applied.

Is my monitor adjusted correctly?

In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting.

Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting.

On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background. Note that the image must be viewed in original size (263 × 68 pixels) - if enlarged or reduced, results are not accurate.

Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended.

To see recent changes, purge the page cache.

FPCs needing feedback view edit

Current nominations

Slavery in Brazil

Voting period ends on 23 May 2025 at 20:12:29 (UTC)

Reason: Good scan, high EV
Articles in which this image appears: Slavery in Brazil, History of Brazil, Jean-Baptiste Debret, Pau de arara, European immigration to Brazil and Americas
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
Creator: Jean-Baptiste Debret

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 20:12, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lei Áurea

Voting period ends on 23 May 2025 at 19:56:35 (UTC)

Reason: Huge resolution of the most important law of the history of Brazil, making the country the last in the Western world to do it.
Articles in which this image appears: Lei Áurea, Slavery in Brazil, Brazilian National Archives, Racism in Brazil, Abolitionism in Brazil and Post-abolition in Brazil
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
Creator: Senado Imperial (Imperial Senate)

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Desert elephant protecting baby

Voting period ends on 23 May 2025 at 08:42:33 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. Very high EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Desert elephant
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nice shot, Charles! Jay Cubby 03:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:57, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Revealing glimpse into lives of these big beasts. – Sca (talk) 14:35, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Common blue butterfly male

Voting period ends on 23 May 2025 at 08:50:30 (UTC)

Reason: High quality focus-stacked large image. Lead image in article.
Articles in which this image appears: Common blue
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hellenic pond turtle

Voting period ends on 23 May 2025 at 09:04:05 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Hellenic pond turtle, Butrint
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:51, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support, the detail is sparser than your usual shots, but still good overall. Jay Cubby 17:48, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist and replace: A Trip to the Moon

Voting period ends on 23 May 2025 at 04:01:34 (UTC)

Delist: SD version

Replacement: HD version

Reason: HD version to replace the current SD version. There's noticeable wear on the print, which I think is present in the original but harder to see because of the lack of fine detail. The crop used on the original video has cut off part of the film on all sides.
Articles this image appears in: A Trip to the Moon, List of appearances of the Moon in fiction, Film, Hugo (film)
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/A Trip to the Moon
Nominator: hinnk (talk)

Delist and replace — hinnk (talk) 04:01, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
D&R per nom. Jay Cubby 03:36, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
D. & R. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:59, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II

Voting period ends on 23 May 2025 at 01:28:31 (UTC)

Reason: Historic photo and of good quality
Articles in which this image appears: Attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II and Pope John Paul II
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
Creator: Undetermined (uploaded on Flickr by Tullio Saba)

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 01:28, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wcamp9 (talk) 03:14, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Authorship "Tullio Saba" is very likely wrong, according to the flickr account that publishes all kinds of old photos, and posters under the same name. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:47, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded a higher-quality version at File:Pope Paul after assassination attempt.jpg shortly after @Basile Morin: wrote here. Hopefully I've not uploaded a copyvio. Anyways, I can replace uses tomorrow, but I'm not impressed with the posterization prominent here. Thoughts on the quality of the other version? Jay Cubby 03:59, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JayCubby: 1) your version is clearly overprocessed. 2) Once gain, authorship "Tullio Saba" is very likely wrong, like this one. Greetings -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:17, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On point #1, that's true, though I'd rather have an overprocessed image than one with blocky and smudgy shadows. Jay Cubby 04:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes @JayCubby: and on Point #2, Tullio Saba is clearly not the author. -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:43, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What's the basis for the {{PD-US-1978-89}} claim? The edition of The New York Times mentioned says "Copyright 1981 The New York Times". hinnk (talk) 04:37, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel Polen fire

Voting period ends on 21 May 2025 at 18:49:58 (UTC)

Reason: Historic photo and of good resolution/quality
Articles in which this image appears: Hotel Polen fire and Rokin Plaza
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
Creator: Bogaerts, Rob / Anefo

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 18:49, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – EV? – Sca (talk) 15:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes; it depicts a deadly hotel fire occurred in 1977. ArionStar (talk) 01:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem of great import historically. -- Sca (talk) 14:38, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grass snake in Slovakia

Voting period ends on 21 May 2025 at 11:35:14 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Grass snake
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:35, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Jay Cubby 15:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Incredibly sharp. The detail really brings the subject to life. Well exposed and composed, and for some reason I'm craving apples. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome back, Charles! ArionStar (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:26, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bokeh, DoF and light. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Hounaam (talk) 10:28, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fawn-breasted brilliant in flight

Voting period ends on 21 May 2025 at 11:29:50 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. Adds value to article. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Fawn-breasted brilliant
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:29, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ArionStar (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome back, Charles! ArionStar (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Just noting WP is not picking up usage due to a redirect. MER-C 17:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Hounaam (talk) 10:28, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Red-headed barbet male

Voting period ends on 21 May 2025 at 11:25:56 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. Adds value to article. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Red-headed barbet, New World barbet
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:25, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent diagnostic photo of the species. Extremly sharp with vibrant colors. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ArionStar (talk) 18:53, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome back, Charles! ArionStar (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:10, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Just noting WP is not picking up usage due to a redirect. MER-C 17:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Links to enwiki articles working for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:34, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support —Hounaam (talk) 10:28, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brown-headed cowbird (male)

Voting period ends on 21 May 2025 at 11:01:00 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image. Could be a set with existing FP File:Brown headed cowbird female in JBWR (25487).jpg.
Articles in which this image appears: Brown-headed cowbird
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Rhododendrites

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:01, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:17, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lighting reveals iridescence on a bird that often looks flat black. Excellent feather detail too. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome back, Charles! ArionStar (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Hounaam (talk) 10:28, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First-ish digital image ever produced, from 1957

Voting period ends on 19 May 2025 at 04:15:56 (UTC)

**Original** – A scan of a photograph of Russell Kirsch's son. Originally captured at 176 × 176 pixel resolution (in its time groundbreaking), this may have been printed out and then scanned *again*.

Reason: The resolution of the image at FPC is good, but the underlying resolution is rather low, as is the image quality. However, it's the first ever digital image, nearly seventy years old. I have restored the image (that is, removed or reduced two fingerprints, plethoral pockmarks, so many scratches and lots of lint). I left the scan artifacts, which are part of the original image, alone.
Articles in which this image appears

FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment (corrected, thanks Adam Cuerden).
Creator: Russell A. Kirsch took the photo, I, JayCubby restored it.

Support as nominator – Jay Cubby 04:15, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging the brilliant restorationists @Adam Cuerden and @Yann for their inputs on the manipulations I've made to this photo.

Also, @DigitalIceAge, this is the cause for which I was likely disrupting your watchlist with the mass image replacement. Jay Cubby 04:17, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be hesitant to change anything further without being sure what is a legitimate flaw. It'd be nice if we could know absolutely certainly if the vertical lines were original. Pixels seem a little rounded at the corners, which probably says more about then-contemporary printers. Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment is probably the better category. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 12:01, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. EV? – Sca (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Sca, do you mean that the subject is unclear (that is, the photo quality is low)? If that's the case, much like View from the Window at Le Gras, this photograph was the first (or the oldest extant) of its kind. Jay Cubby 16:07, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't necessarily make it a worthwhile TFP candidate. -- Sca (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Sca -- File:Untitled (point de vue), Niépce 1827 — HRC 2020 (cropped).jpg is a FP Jay Cubby 17:59, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This user had nothing to do with its choice as a TFP. -- Sca (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Restoration is OK. Low quality, but notable picture, high EV. Yann (talk) 17:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, due to the picture's importance, notability, date (1957), and high EV indeed. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:49, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ArionStar (talk) 01:30, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Hounaam (talk) 10:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Snowy Owl with American Black Duck

Voting period ends on 18 May 2025 at 16:02:34 (UTC)

**Original** – A Snowy Owl with its prey, an American Black Duck, in Biddeford Pool, Maine.

Reason: This image is already a Featured Picture and a Picture of the Day in Wikimedia Commons. It's a sharp, well-exposed image with the owl facing the viewer. There are many images of Snowy Owls on Wikipedia, but this one checks many boxes that the others do not.
Articles in which this image appears: Snowy Owl, Dover Demon, Predation problem
FP category for this image: birds
Creator: Chuck Homler

Support as nominator – Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Graphic in a grisly way. – Sca (talk) 15:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, poor duck. Easternsahara (talk) 23:22, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 09:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:29, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:18, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev

Voting period ends on 18 May 2025 at 07:57:31 (UTC)

**Original** – Mikhail Gorbachev in Ocotber 1991

Reason: High resolution portrait of the last leader of the Soviet Union
Articles in which this image appears: President of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev
FP category for this image: People/Political
Creator: Lev L. Medvedev

Support as nominator – Dmedvedev83 (talk) 07:57, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose An unremarkable B&W image -- one of 18 pix in the bio target, most of which are in color. – Sca (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per Sca's note. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:53, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dua Lipa

Voting period ends on 17 May 2025 at 03:20:40 (UTC)

Reason: FP on Commons and high EV
Articles in which this image appears: Dua Lipa, Emerging Artists, Brit Award for Best New Artist and Brit Award for British Female Solo Artist
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Harald Krichel

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 03:20, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Nom'd image is one of six in the 6,000-word bio article & doesn't lead the infobox. EV? – Sca (talk) 15:00, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, EV; it is a good picture of Dua Lipa; be a lead one is not a required criterion. ArionStar (talk) 16:42, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – per Sca. There's no EV. EV is a FPC criterion and this ain't got any. — Benison (Beni · talk) 05:49, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A picture of a Grammy-winner artist? No EV? ArionStar (talk) 18:57, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, good photo, unlike the mugshot-ish photos of celebrities against an advert-laden backdrop we so often use because they're 'more recent'. Jay Cubby 18:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Samarjit Lankesh

Voting period ends on 17 May 2025 at 02:32:39 (UTC)

Reason: FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Samarjit Lankesh
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Rudhra Varma

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 02:32, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mountains at Collioure

Voting period ends on 16 May 2025 at 21:43:38 (UTC)

Reason: high quality reproduction of a notable painting with its own article
Articles in which this image appears: Mountains at Collioure, André Derain
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: André Derain

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 21:43, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:30, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Vignetting? ArionStar (talk) 02:22, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:13, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Easternsahara (talk) 23:20, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 09:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:19, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1907 ultra high Relief $20 Saint-Gaudens double eagle

Voting period ends on 16 May 2025 at 16:16:01 (UTC)

Reason: Considered by many (myself included) to be the most beautiful American coin minted to date. FP with high participation at its Commons nomination.
Articles in which this image appears: Saint-Gaudens double eagle
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Currency/USA coins
Creator: Heritage Auctions

Support as nominator – Jay Cubby 16:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:29, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:14, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 09:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:20, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations — to be closed

Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.

Older nominations requiring additional input from users

These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.

Closing procedure

A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Armbrust/closeFPC.js

When NOT promoted, perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing {{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}} on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.

When promoted, perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:

Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG

Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
Add the image to:
- Template:Announcements/New featured content - newest on top, remove the oldest so that 15 are listed at all times.
- Wikipedia:Goings-on - newest on bottom.
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs - newest on top.
Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} to the top of the section.
Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the May archive. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} from this page to the bottom of the archive.
If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Delist closing procedure

Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.

If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:

Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.

If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.

If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.

Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the delisted image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the top of the section.
Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive.
If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Recently closed nominations

Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.

The Bottle Imp (2)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 May 2025 at 19:08:52 (UTC)

Reason: Probably should have made this a set with the first one. But, ah, well. Thought I'd be a lot longer.
Articles in which this image appears: The Bottle Imp, Island Nights' Entertainments (the short story collection), William Hatherell
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Literary illustrations
Creator: William Hatherell, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 19:08, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:48, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Adam, is that a woodcut? – Sca (talk) 14:52, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Presumably. Certainly looks like one. I don't like stating things definitively without a source, but I'd be very surprised to learn it wasn't. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 11:39, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Period illustration of an intriguing, convoluted tale. – Sca (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Hi Adam. The correct date of Hatherell's illustrations for The Bottle Imp (both this one and the one you previously nominated) is 1891. They were created for the serialized publication of the story in Black and White in March and April of that year, and then reused in the first edition of Island Nights' Entertainments, published in 1893, the year before Stevenson's death. You can see a copy of the first edition here. Your copy of 1905 is a reprint. Choliamb (talk) 11:30, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the date one puts in for this file is the date of the edition they're from, not first publication. Otherwise it's misleading: This isn't from the first edition, nor the magazine. The caption on the image actually varies between editions due to revisions; the Wikisource copy of 1901 quotes a different, less accurate to the art line; the first edition matches my reprint.

On which subject, I note that I was apparently less complete than I thought I was: there's six (maybe 7, if you count the title wordart) images still to do. I moved recently; I'm pretty sure I saw the book while packing. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 01:03, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, good quality print. Jay Cubby 17:40, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 09:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:26, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:20, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:William Hatherell - Robert Louis Stephenson - The Bottle Imp 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:09, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Toxopneustes pileolus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 May 2025 at 10:47:17 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Toxopneustes pileolus
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Echinoderms
Creator: Diego Delso

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:47, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:49, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 21:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:30, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 09:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:20, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Erizo de flor (Toxopneustes pileolus), Zanzíbar, Tanzania, 2024-06-01, DD 134.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:26, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Callistocypraea aurantium

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 May 2025 at 10:39:05 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Callistocypraea aurantium
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Molluscs
Creator: Llez

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:49, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 21:36, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:30, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Educational, high resolution. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:56, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
SupportEasternsahara (talk) 23:20, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 09:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:21, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Callistocypraea aurantium 01.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:22, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Woljeonggyo interior

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 May 2025 at 21:35:54 (UTC)

Reason: Visually attractive, shows off the interior of a significant tourist attraction well.
Articles in which this image appears: Woljeonggyo
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Creator: bryan... on Flickr

Support as nominator – seefooddiet (talk) 21:35, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perspective issue. The columns are leaning. Blown highlights. Sorry. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, as above. Easternsahara (talk) 23:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish land purchase in Palestine

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 May 2025 at 19:56:27 (UTC)

Reason: High EV and good scan
Articles in which this image appears: Jewish land purchase in Palestine, Israeli–Palestinian conflict, United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine, Village Statistics, 1945 and Mandatory Palestine
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps
Creator: United Nations

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 19:56, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The bar for historical prints is fairly high. I'm not impressed by the crease, the resolution, and the discoloration. There's certainly a high EV, and it's a nice graphic in theory (I'm distracted by the crooked text and whatnot), but we could do better. Jay Cubby 22:01, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The coloration was also a doubt to me but it seems accurate, vide File:UN Palestine Partition Versions 1947.jpg. ArionStar (talk) 03:00, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This might be a composite of two photographs, the second one looks to be. There's a slight coloration difference in the seam, which is most of what bothers me. It could just be a crease, which is equally irksome I'm afraid. Jay Cubby 01:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, I did not notice the tilt of the text, seems to be a good image to me. Is the data reliable though? Easternsahara (talk) 23:15, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marcel Duchamp

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 May 2025 at 08:57:20 (UTC)

Reason: High quality, good composition
Articles in which this image appears: Marcel Duchamp
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists
Creator: Man Ray

Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 08:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Even though it is by the famous Man Ray, the photo has many deficiencies, among them lack of shadow detail, mediocre sharpness and a messy background. --Janke | Talk 10:22, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Gimmicky lighting, clutter, visual info fails to explain subject EV. – Sca (talk) 14:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per above. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:53, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

George Metesky (The Mad Bomber)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 May 2025 at 03:55:11 (UTC)

Reason: A high quality photo of a notorious criminal. Usually don't see ones for that type of individual.
Articles in which this image appears: George Metesky
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others
Creator: Al Ravenna

Support as nominator – GamerPro64 03:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Wacko. – Sca (talk) 14:59, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:31, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Easternsahara (talk) 23:19, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 09:52, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:George Metesky Behind Bars (cropped).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abaporu

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 May 2025 at 01:14:59 (UTC)

Reason: Arguably the most famous Brazilian painting of all time. Inspired an entire art movement. Notable, high EV for the articles it appears in, very high resolution scan.
Articles in which this image appears: Abaporu, Tarsila do Amaral
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Tarsila do Amaral

Support as nominator – – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 01:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very high resolution, but as a Brazilian I need to say that it's not the accurate shade of the painting (due to the lighting perhaps?). See here and here. The shadows on both sides are disturbing too (lighting again?). Sorry. I still have hopes of seeing our Abaporu in the best uploaded version possible on wiki. ArionStar (talk) 01:54, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on above grounds. Easternsahara (talk) 23:05, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:15, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SLR flash

Voting period ends on 21 May 2025 at 11:04:35 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Flash (photography)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment
Creator: W.carter

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:04, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Lost half way down article. Little EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:17, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's in the section for 'Electronic flash' where it belongs. That is the latest stage of flashes to be developed, so of course it's a bit down in the article. That is the structure of articles. EV is the same as for the magnesium flash powder lamp further up, they both show flashes in action. Cart (talk) 13:19, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
support. The way it was taken was interesting. Per Cart: A reflector was set up in front of the Pentax camera in a dark room. The camera taking the photo was set up much the same way you do when photographing lightning at night: on a tripod, manual focus and long shutter time. The Pentax was activated using its timer function, and the camera making the photo was triggered just before the flash would fire from the Pentax. This way, the flash bounced off the reflector and illuminated the camera enough to be exposed by its own flash, and the other camera was able to register both the flash firing and the Pentax in one long-exposure photo. Very nicely done. Jay Cubby 15:24, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment, but to be honest, it doesn't matter how a photo was created for FPs here on en-wp, only the end-result and how useful it is matter. --Cart (talk) 15:40, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Split-second glare detracts from readily accessible visual info. What's special about this camera flash? – Sca (talk) 17:25, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing, except that it exists. We have very few photos at all on Commons of a flash at the moment it fires, which was the whole reason for creating a reasonably hi-res and good quality photo of it. --Cart (talk) 18:01, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Please withdraw this nomination. I'm very pleased that Commons thought it had quality enough to merit an FP there with their different criteria, and it might trigger some ideas for other photographers on how to use light and reflectors, but the photo was just an experiment to see how it would look if I captured the flash in a photo. I'm glad that it's useful in some articles in a minor way, but FP on en-wiki was certainly not what I had in mind for this photo. Thank you, Cart (talk) 18:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Good work, Cart! ArionStar (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw this nomination, per above. MER-C 19:02, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suspended nominations

This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.