Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeta Components
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Apache Incubator. The Bushranger One ping only 07:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Zeta Components (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article have not any reliable source therefore I don't think it was a notable PHP framework. (It is retired now per Apache Zeta Components homepage but no one edited this article to update status of development!) –ebraminiotalk 07:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 15:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 15:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Apache Incubator: this topic is definitely notable (coverage: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=fr&u=http://www.journaldunet.com/developpeur/php/ez-components-apache-0410.shtml%7C2=The eZ Components PHP infrastructure is revived by Apache (by Le Journal du Net), https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&u=http://www.golem.de/1004/74594.html%7C2=eZ Components become Zeta Components (by Golem.de) and Debunking PHP's bad reputation (by .net magazine) — suggests so), but I don't think that covering now obsolete framework, which never was described in detail, is practical. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.