Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zanja 8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zanja 8

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability. No reliable sources. No usable sources found in Google. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 04:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. At this point, I wouldn't oppose a speedy deletion under A7, but I'm not going to go so far as to tag it. I'm just not that WP:BOLD :) --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 04:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There are plenty of sources, some of it fairly in-depth coverage (for example) but it's all in the Redlands Daily Facts or The Sun, which are local newspapers. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article, as written, lacks sources and covers a subject that fails WP:MUSIC. It is unclear whether the local news sources mentioned above are truly independent. The example cited appears, stylistically, to be an except from publicity material. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.