Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZEPHYR (code word)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC) --90.201.62.184 (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)===ZEpir (code word)===[reply]
- ZEPHYR (code word) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence this term is notable, just passing mentions in sources confirming it existed. LFaraone 22:10, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see us having an article for an internally-used code word at one company. If there's a place for this, it's in the British American Tobacco article, but I sdon't think even a redirect makes sense. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The main assertion for the term, a quote from a British American Tobacco memo, is un-sourced. The sources cited in the article do not support notability for the term. - tucoxn\talk 00:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.