Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouTube Rewind: What Does 2013 Say?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to YouTube Rewind. Note that the nominator also stated in a later comment that they do not oppose a merge. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube Rewind: What Does 2013 Say?

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTFILM. No evidence of significant third party coverage of this YouTube video. It exists and a lot of people watched it....which doesn't make it notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep or merge to Youtube Rewind per this and this. edtiorEهեইдအ😎 08:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The google search results mean nothing. I wouldn't oppose a merge. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. YouTube Rewind is notable, but individual editions probably are not. With little more content in this article than a cast list, it doesn't justify a separate article. QueenCake (talk) 20:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If this is merged, Rewind YouTube Style 2012 will need to be examined to see if the coverage for that is heavy enough to warrant its own entry. I would argue that the article only really needs a general synopsis section for each video at this point in time. If/when the episodes/videos grow too numerous, there can be a list spinoff page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also mildly have to question the need for the cast page on the main article, given that relatively few of the people have appeared each year. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. YouTube Rewind is noticeable as it is created by Youtube. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 20:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it seems this is best connected to that, questionably independently notable. SwisterTwister talk 02:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.