Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yii Framework

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Editors can feel free to discuss possible redirects separately. Cirt (talk) 09:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yii Framework

Contested prod. Non-notable software with no reliable sources provided and none found. TN‑X-Man 15:48, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

del no evidence of notability. Dzied Bulbash (talk) 16:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete, or merge to Web application framework. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep, it is the successor (same developer) of the well-known PRADO framework. Ekerazha (talk) 09:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to PRADO or Web application framework. --Walmwutter (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It is its successor but it is a different product from PRADO, so redirection to PRADO isn't a good idea. Ekerazha (talk) 09:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to PRADO assuming the lineage is correct. Honestly, web applications frameworks are a dime a dozen, and I'm not convinced PRADO passes the notability test either. VG ☎ 19:27, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Dzied Bulbash. I don't see how it's related to PRADO. Stifle (talk) 07:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.