Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yevade Subramanyam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn (self / non-admin closure). ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yevade Subramanyam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film is upcoming (WP:CRYSTALBALL applies) and does not have much coverage; fails notability guidelines (WP:GNG and WP:MOVIE). ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 10:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 05:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 05:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. India-related articles are tempting to delete because they tend to be poorly written and treat subjects that are of no interest to Americans. However, this seems to be a fairly big production. It also claims to be the first Telugu movie shot on Everest, which is something I guess. So I vote keep. Bacchiad (talk) 03:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

alt: WP:INDAFD: Yevade Subramanyam

Keep Sorry nominator, but we do not claim WP:CRYSTALBALL if truly diligent WP:BEFORE shows notability. As this has completed filming and is the first Telugu film to be shot on Everest, we have a decent assertion of notability,[1] and as it IS receiving coverage and is both sourcable and improvable,[2] we have a topic that meets WP:NFF (paragraph 3). It needs work, not deletion. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @MichaelQSchmidt: @Bacchiad: Thanks for the comments and sources. Wasn't aware of INDAFD - through my searching, I didn't find the short (and rather repetitive) articles giving a basic description of the movie to be particularly convincing of notability. I do note that I missed this and this, however, which are expansive and valuable for the article. I'll go ahead and withdraw my nomination. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.