Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yerramilli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yerramilli

Not clear what this article is actually about. About a surname, about a place, about the temple? Also, no references and no assertion of notability. Prod was removed, so I list it here. Tone 19:33, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unfocused article with no sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Poor article of what looks like a historical temple, but needs time to improve not be deleted. Greenman (talk) 23:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In order to have anything useful, this would need a complete rewrite. Keeping it as such is a bad idea. --Tone 12:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Article should be edited to focus on temple, with peripheral comments on the legend behind its founding, and the family dynasty associated with it. Article should be reviewed in three months time to check compliance Rotovia (talk) 00:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.