Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yambla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yambla

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero evidence of notability. The refs are very minor product awards, written as press releases. DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as "Yambla San Francisco company" found some links at News and browser but nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 17:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with DGG. I would have speedied it under A7, as initially requested -- Samir 01:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and above editors. Nothing in searches to show it meets WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.