Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YaST

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (1) WP:SNOW (2) The WP:IDONTLIKEIT tone of the nomination (3) The overall merit of the 30-so nominations made by the same user on the same day. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 05:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YaST

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Should be merged into OpenSUSE. TheAwesome Hwyh 18:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Computing, and Software. TheAwesome Hwyh 18:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Easily notable, even independent of (open)SUSE, with in-depth coverage in Phoronix (SUSE's YaST Team Drops Cockpit With New Installer Code) and C-Net (Novell management tool going open source). There are already further independent sources in the article's reference list. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is notable enough. Also mentioned here. TurboSuperA+_(connect) 17:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Even though it was originally developed by SuSE, it is now used by several other distributions, for which it is the chief system update tool. If YaST is not notable as an update tool, I don't know what is. — Tonymec (talk) 03:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.