Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xsnow
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:33, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Xsnow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSOFT Clenpr (talk) 16:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:22, 26 April 2025 (UTC)- Delete No significant coverage. Current article is unsourced. Sources that I have found are largely instructional on bloggish *nix sites (i.e. how to install xsnow) or are primary and cannot establish notability.Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 12:20, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:30, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: No significant coverage from any reliable sources is found. The mentioned reference in article is primarily hence, mustn't considered. Hence, fails WP:GNG, WP:RS, WP:V and WP:SIGCOV.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.