Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XFree86 logfile (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 09:12, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

XFree86 logfile

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined PROD as the article previously survived an AfD as no consensus. However, that was ten years ago and I will renominate. The following is a quote from the PROD that was placed by an IP editor. "WP:NOTMANUAL. Belongs elsewhere (Wikibooks? Wikisource?). No more encyclopedic than an article about any other random logfile. Previous AfD dates from 2004, standards have changed drastically since the days where "it's interesting" was valid inclusion criteria." I am leaning to delete on this myself. Safiel (talk) 02:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—WP:NOTMANUAL, and there's not much else to be said. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 21:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A relic from an older time when Wikipedia had no inclusion criteria. This is clearly indiscriminate. I don't think we need an embedded XFree86 wiki inside Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.