Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XEvil (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

XEvil

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search (only passing mentions). There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 03:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 03:10, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found nothing better. Pinging Comrade Graham, Clyde Miller, Klingoncowboy4, MER-C, Al E., Chargh, Opabinia regalis and Mojo Hand. SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 06:08, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 06:08, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.