Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XER (file format)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Primavera (software). (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 08:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

XER (file format)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable file format. Power~enwiki (talk) 06:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:06, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There is suitable redirect target (article about Primavera application). Pavlor (talk) 08:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Selective merge to Primavera (software). I have not been able to find much about the P6 exchange format that isn't tutorial how-to material. It does not seem to meet notability threshold. The fact that it is an exchange format for Primavera databases is verifiable, however. Merging a sentence to that effect in Primavera (software) would provide needed context and be of due weight. Redirect would be in principle OK, too, except that XER is not mentioned in the target article. --Mark viking (talk) 03:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

merge. Article indeed of questionable notability. Adding a section to Primavera_(software) seems to be logical. tonyxc600 comms logs 14:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.