Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WxMEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WxMEdit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable software. Only references are passing mentions and not significant coverage. Google searches not finding very many hits, none of the significant coverage. Its been speedy deleted before and nominated for prod. noq (talk) 08:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Promo of a not-notable text-editor. After deletion this should be salted, as the owner/PR-department keeps recreating the article. The Banner talk 10:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no major coverage as far as I could tell (there seem to be some results in Chinese, but I can't tell if they are blogs or something serious). --Jakob (talk) 13:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - No evidence of any notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 19:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability. There is no significant coverage found in independent reliable sources. It seems like he still doesn't understand why the article was deleted. SmileBlueJay97 talk 08:51, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per SmileBlueJay97 and Fails WP:NSOFT .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.