Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workspace Macro (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Workspace Macro

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

2008 NC close when sourcing requirements were very different. No evidence this product was ever notable. Parent company has no article, nor is there evidence available that it would be notable enough to create and merge this to. StarM 16:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. StarM 16:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A ten year old macro recorder for a company/website that does't exist. Not sure it was even notable back in the day... Oaktree b (talk) 21:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment so what it doesn't exist now? Notability is not measured in life span.Unspectrogram (talk) 05:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply there's no sourcing to indicate it was ever notable. StarM 14:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The existing references do not meet WP:GNG My search did not find anything to add. There is no indication this has ever been notable. Jeepday (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.