Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Word Sense Induction and Disambiguation task
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to SemEval. MBisanz talk 04:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Word Sense Induction and Disambiguation task (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article lacks sufficient context, making it a borderline speedy deletion candidate, but it is probably better to do a more thorough review; I suggest deletion, but it could also potentially be merged into Word sense induction if the consensus moves that way. I am unable to find reliable secondary sourcing for this under WP:GNG; it appears to be a description of a specific project that did not attract notice, but in any event is extremely technical in nature and hard to understand. Batard0 (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
With regards to WSI+WSD task, i agree that it isn't that likable as compared to the other variants of WSD evaluation. And also it isn't a popular task that researchers want to dabble with. However it still remains notable as a task that recurs in Semeval 2007 and 2013: see http://nlp.cs.swarthmore.edu/semeval/tasks/task02/summary.shtml , http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/semeval-2013/task13/ . About verbal technicality, See above http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2012_October_7#Multilingual_and_Crosslingual_WSD. BTW, i do agree that this article needs lots of work on the content, i'm not personally involved in the task, hence the original article i wrote for this page is rather skimpy Alvations (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:37, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:37, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to SemEval for reasons I gave at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multilingual and Crosslingual WSD. Editors interested in this discussion may also be interested in that one. Cnilep (talk) 01:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 20:24, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- To the extent that SemEval is notable (no independent coverage right now), merge there. Tijfo098 (talk) 07:47, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.