Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WooPlus

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2020 June 7.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WooPlus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

insuffient evidence of notability ,and promotional as well DGG ( talk ) 09:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Found these from Google to help with the discussion- BBC News, PEOPLE Magazine, Bustle, VICE, Huffington Post Australia, AskMEN, The Daily Dot, Daily Mail, Cosmopolitan and Femina. Hope this helps other reviewers. Csgir (talk) 11:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete spam by an WP:SPA who gamed WP:ACPERM & ran away. Should have gone A7/G11. Cabayi (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this spam. I have blocked the creator for likely undisclosed paid advocacy. MER-C 18:17, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.