Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wong Fu Productions videography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:37, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wong Fu Productions videography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of YouTube videos, few if any of which are actually notable. Anything salvageable from here should be merged into the main company article; the rest is unsourced (and unsourceable, to anything but primary sources) trivia. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge notable. They are a production company, that has made some big projects, and these should all be mentioned, just like a production company for traditional media. Several of these works are notable in themselves, like Agents of Secret Stuff, which looks like it will be sticking around now. But we don't need a list of Wong Fu Weekends, and this trivial nature. I think that once it is trimmed down to their notable works, it can fit on the main article. 117Avenue (talk) 04:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The few that are notable should already be on the main page, and the rest are hard to verify. As this is a simple list and nothing more, is any attribution really needed that's worth a merge instead of mere deletion? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:02, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The team has created a number of notable works. Their main article page is not a dumping ground for details of specific releases, just as James Cameron has his James Cameron filmography. I really don't understand why there's such widespread opposition to writing about YouTube users who are at least as notable as many film producers. The mere fact that they produce their content for YouTube does not make them less legitimate. As an encyclopedia it is not our job to call any works "trivial." CaseyPenk (talk) 03:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that every entry at James Cameron filmography is linked, and everything at that list is notable itself for an article, things like "Hugger" and "We're on a Tank! Pt 1/2" are not. 117Avenue (talk) 04:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with the article on Wong Fu. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 08:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: Notable production company, but Wong Fu Weekends isn't really needed. Zappa O Mati 02:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and do not Merge. None of this content is covered by any indepedant sources, so fails WP:NOTABILITY.
Do not Merge to main article because the GAR correctly determined it shouldn't be added. I avoided such a list because, as stated in the last paragraph of "Notable productions", Wong Fu has released over 100 short films. I have only mentioned the most significant ones..--Otterathome (talk) 21:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Otter. I'm not seeing the potential for merge. Anything notable looks already covered. Axem Titanium (talk) 22:20, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.