Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wittybee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wittybee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable app. Can not find independent reliable sources which can establish notability. Mar11 (talk) 06:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 06:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 06:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 06:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 06:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no indication of notability or significance. In addition, this content belongs on the developer's web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable tool/app. No reliable coverage at all. Author is SPA, making edits to various related pages advertising for this tool. possible COI . A facebook account with same name as author lists Wittybee technologies as employer. ChunnuBhai (talk) 06:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clear WP:GNG failure Spiderone 07:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Subject lacks notability. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 08:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence provided or found to indicate that this meets the WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 08:26, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Snow delete and salt. Already created and deleted twice per G11. Basically no coverage of the app that I can find. TimothyJosephWood 13:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete--Subject fails WP:NSOFT.Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 14:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. As a download site, Softpedia cannot be considered independent, and in any case, one ref is insufficient. Dialectric (talk) 17:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.