Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wing It (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wing It

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable short animated film. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All the coverage I found was pretty minimal. It's also pretty difficult to search for since "Wing it" is such a common term that it blows out almost all mentions of the movie. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - absolutely no indication of notability. Short animated film produced by students. It has more than 1M views on YouTube but so do millions of non-notable videos. No apparent redirect or merge target. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Notable reliable sources not found. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 22:59, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, lacks sourcing. Redoryxx (talk) 10:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; not notable. Kolma8 (talk) 20:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.