Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinZO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 09:54, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WinZO

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be written to promote the company. Lacks WP:CORPDEPTH. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lots of socks/SPAs in the article's history suggest the nom is correct in their assessment. The coverage is WP:MILL-like, and I don't think it is sufficient to meet WP:NCORP/WP:GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.