Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinClon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 22:58, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- WinClon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software. Fails WP:GNG. A Google News search and Google News Archive search produces no significant coverage from reliable and independent sources for "WinClon" and a Google News search and Google News Archive search produces no significant coverage from reliable and independent sources for "Saumsung Recovery Solution". OlYeller21Talktome 12:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable software product. Breno talk 14:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It does not appear to be notable as per WP:GNG. §everal⇒|Times 19:08, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources, WP:MILL issue... Effectively this article is hopeless — vendor-supplied custom "solution" does not have a snowball's chance in hell. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 22:23, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete but redirect to List of disk cloning software per WP:NORESCUE. --→gab 24dot grab← 17:24, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.