Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildwind
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Pine Valley (All My Children). editors can obviously be selective in what content should be presented there Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Wildwind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deprodded with suggestion to merge. However, this is all in-universe plot summary and fancruft, so I see literally nothing worth merging. There is no out of universe notability at all. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pending - This topic is not significantly covered and, therefore, fails "general notability guideline". Also, fails WP:N; WP:Notability (fiction) is currently an essay and not reliable. Before voting, I recommend that you read an essay WP:AADD. I have seen INHERIT- and WP:EXISTENCE-related arguments; none work for me. Nevertheless, a possible redirect to... All My Children? Why not userfication to a loyal soap fan, such as Raintheone and TAnthony? ......Maybe I'll change to delete if everybody votes the same thing. --George Ho (talk) 21:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Trim and Merge to Pine Valley (All My Children). In-universe plot summary is a valid part of an article, although the detail here is excessive. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Trim and Merge to Pine Valley (All My Children), per ThaddeusB. Cavarrone (talk) 16:03, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Too non-notable for a separate article (I can hardly think of any somewhat-notable fictional mansions beside Pemberley, and even that only for its many portrayals in fictional adaptations), nothing to merge to Pine Valley (All My Children). – sgeureka t•c 06:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- merge . here is no basis in policy for deleting altogether. DGG ( talk ) 08:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.