Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiPock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiPock

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable mobile application, there is no evidence this passes WP:GNG Triplestop x3 17:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference has been added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patricek97 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable advertising, and because their offer of, and I quote, "a minimum of 4GB storage space" for the English Wikipedia (or "wiki encyclopedia") seems horribly misguided. Greg Tyler ^{(t • c)} 20:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Did the nominator even look at Google News?

[1] (translation),

[2] (translation),

[3] (translation),

...and 13 more unchecked news sources. — Rankiri (talk) 16:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:20, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any en_us links? AFAIK, all the ghits were Pr/ads but open to independent US coverage. I wanted to make a WikiComposer app that let's you write pages while using dead time- that is find links and citations etc and put them into a wiki page. Mostly a research tool but using wikipage creation as a goal may help focus the thinking. Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per rankiri. 17 google hits although most in other languages. Ikip (talk) 02:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.