Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki-Link-Validator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-Link-Validator

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

alternate format: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, but not G11 worthy. I checked for sources and I found nothing but the GitHub page. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage of this software.Dialectric (talk) 01:56, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No valid sourcing found for our notability guideline. DeVerm (talk) 23:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - advertising. . . Mean as custard (talk) 08:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not finding sources. FeatherPluma (talk) 23:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.