Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikanda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikanda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have looked, and I cannot find any reliable sources covering this encyclopedia. Indeed, the only hits I could find are from this article on Wikipedia and its mirrors, the wikanda site itself, and unrelated pages on people with the name "Wikanda". Accordingly, this article fails both WP:WEBCRIT and WP:GNG. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Found it mentioned by some Spanish blogs, but no real reliable sourcing. Nwlaw63 (talk) 02:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Finding a lot of people named Wikanda, but no reliable sources covering this wiki. Not notable. T C N7JM 02:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – No RS giving coverage. Jezhotwells (talk) 08:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.