Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whopper training

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whopper training

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is most likely non-notable product (if that's the right thing to call it; I can't think of anything better). I did a search, and I could find any significant coverage in reliable sources, much less anything to suggest that it is used "all over Holland", as the article claims. Not to mention that the article has a promotional tone. Biblioworm 01:15, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per the reasons state in the nomination; it reads with a promotional tone, and a search turned up a bunch of job-finding websites that don't relate to the content of the article in any way, so I'm not seeing it as being notable. Command and Conquer Expert! ^{speak to me...}_{review me...} 02:02, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Gerard Weide does exist in the Netherlands and is a developer of Whopper training but other then it exists and after translating a number of articles from Dutch to english, it doesn't pass notability guide lines for inclusion. - Pmedema (talk) 17:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.