Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WhistleOut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WhistleOut

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2020. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Websites. UtherSRG (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A poorly-covered ad created by a disposable account. It's a shame it's been up for so long. Suitskvarts (talk) 06:36, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 18:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:NOTPROMO. Even if sources are found for NCORP, TNT via deletion here. —siro χ o 21:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.