Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where the Dead Go to Die
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 04:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Where the Dead Go to Die (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not seeing enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. What little there is comes from tiny niche horror websites (and there doesn't seem much of that, either). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 12:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 12:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, DVD Talk and Horrornews are full reviews and are considered Reliable Sources. Therefore it passes WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 13:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Neither of those look like particularly reliable sources. Horrornews is a WP:SPS and DVD Talk ... well, its links to its about page and information about its reviewers are broken, which is not an ideal first impression. It's also stuffed with ads and promotional links. Only information about the reviewer I could find was in the link to his personal page, which does nothing to communicate anything about a reputation for film criticism (it's an artist page). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- These sources have been discussed before and ARE reliable sources. See My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)'s comment below. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Neither of those look like particularly reliable sources. Horrornews is a WP:SPS and DVD Talk ... well, its links to its about page and information about its reviewers are broken, which is not an ideal first impression. It's also stuffed with ads and promotional links. Only information about the reviewer I could find was in the link to his personal page, which does nothing to communicate anything about a reputation for film criticism (it's an artist page). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Donaldd23 is right: there are two reviews and both sites are considered reliable sources, generally accepted at Afds (see this or Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_314#HORRORNEWS.NET for example, and Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_47#DVDTalk_and_DVD_Verdict). You don't need to but you can at least add another review at PopHorror (also considered reliable) [1] .-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, per @Donaldd23 Brachy08 (Talk) 04:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- I disagree with the above keep votes on the reliability of HorrorNews based on the concerns I commented on the RSN thread, but have not decided a vote yet. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 21:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.