Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webware (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to web application. → Call me Hahc21 21:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Webware

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article already exists as web application. This one begins with "Webware is the same as a web application, web-app, rich Internet application (RIA) or Cloudware." It's also 100% original research, with no cited sources. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I'd say speedy delete A10 except that it is a ~~good~~ plausible redirect to web application. Meters (talk) 16:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect while this article is redundant with the better sourced web application, the term has been around since at least 1997, for instance see "Webware security" by Edward Felten. So the term is a plausible search term and a redirect is warranted. --Mark viking (talk) 18:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.