Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webkinz Webcast
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Webkinz Webcast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable; website down. J (t) 02:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found no significant reliable coverage. SL93 (talk) 23:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:08, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:08, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Στc. 01:35, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, arguably eligable for speedy delete since it doesn't really claim notability. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:08, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No significance, uses all first party sources, and a "newspaper" which is a dead link to the person webspace of someone's mobileme account (i.e. a blog), so I see no reason to keep this. Also feels a little promotional. Millermk90 (talk) 06:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.