Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WeFarm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 16:14, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WeFarm

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 07:42, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Per some of the reference which were reliable. Joedray (talk) 11:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clearly notable: multiple high quality independent press sources including the BBC, Reuters, Financial Times, City A.M; multiple decent/OK quality Google Scholar references; even a couple of books. Humansdorpie (talk) 20:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I've tidied it up a fraction, added a couple of sources, edited some of the less encyclopaedic passages. Humansdorpie (talk) 17:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per sources given by Humansdorpie. The article needs some work but there the Reuters and Financial Times articles give enough SIGCOV of the company. Jumpytoo Talk 20:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Article is good enough to pass WP:NWEB with sources indicated by Humansdorpie. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 00:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.