Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WHYFM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 03:57, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WHYFM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band as of WP:BAND. Battleaxe9872 23:08, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Page claims future fame, so WP:CRYSTAL applies here as well. VQuakr (talk) 23:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I really hope that the article, WHYFM, doesn't get deleted. A lot of people in the area i live in love this band and they are really great. The people would love to know more about this band using Wikipedia. I really hope Wikipedia would understand and think about leaving the article up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tylercarroll1992 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not a good reason to keep an article; please read WP:POPULARITY. Anyway, delete. The article is barely even a stub, which is probably because sources can't be found. It doesn't even state who the "two known members" are. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:27, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete WP:CSD#A7: band with no indication of notability. --Closeapple (talk) 08:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.