Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voodoo SMS
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Deleted (G11) and salted by User:Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure). Natg 19 (talk) 23:07, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Voodoo SMS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the article does not meet criteria of WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Two references are provided: one where the company is briefly mentioned in the context of an article about SMS security, and the other is a news report relating to religious objection to their name. Google search for "Voodoo SMS" comes up with fewer than 100 results, none of which are reliable sources that discuss the company significantly. Article was deleted several times before as advertising, and the current version retains some promotional language. ... discospinster talk 13:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 13:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 13:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Its a small company but still relevant. Its one of the leading bulk SMS providers in the UK, but hasnt spent much money on PR. So surely that doesnt merit deletion just based on the fact that there arent many references to it on the web? All advertising has been removed from text.
@discospinster - can you please give specific examples of 'promotional language' so this can be reviewed? Thanks.
- The article was speedy deleted, can we move to close this AFD? Chris857 (talk) 18:56, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.